Integration Testing: Types, Approaches, Tools, Examples

  • by

Integration testing is vital in today’s IT and software development landscapes, especially when requirements are dynamic and deadlines are tight. Even when each module of the application is unit-tested, some errors may still exist. To identify these errors and ensure that the modules work well together after integration, integration testing is crucial. In the incremental testing method, testing is carried out by integrating two or more logically connected modules, and the application’s optimal operation is then tested. This process can be implemented with either Bottom Up or Top Down approach. Unit testing uses modules for testing purpose, and these modules are combined and tested in integration testing.

  • Incremental integration testing encompass the basic concepts of integration testing.
  • It makes sure that integrated modules work correctly as expected.
  • Your product supports automation testing and is stable for you to run the test scripts.
  • Testers make use of stubs/drivers depending on which methodology they are using.
  • This means you can spot problems and figure out how to solve them more quickly.

It is also possible to integrate the sub-systems that are functioning first, then just put the other sub-systems later in separate phases. System integration testing is a level of integration testing that verifies the interaction and communication between different subsystems or components of a complete system. It tests the system as a whole to ensure its components integrate correctly.

Big Bang Testing

Stubs are temporary replacements for modules and produce the same output as the actual products. In addition to the main module serving as a test driver, stubs are substituted for all components directly under the main control. Further, the stubs are replaced with actual components one by one. Entry and exit criteria for integration tests define when it is possible to begin integration tests and when integration tests are fully complete.

Which is Incremental integration testing

The incremental tests are quite faster in comparison to the end to end testing process. We don’t get a chance to test interfaces and subsystems thoroughly before unifying the modules. We then identify the target layer through a heuristic approach. Through this approach, you can choose a layer allowing minimal usage of drivers and stubs. We identify a middle layer from which you perform top-down and bottom-up testing.

Visual Regression Cloud

Sandwich testing approach allows parallel performing both top-down and bottom-up approaches. The top-down testing approach is not recommended for large-scale systems as fault localization is complicated. These are some common situations where automation testing is the right thing. But let’s move forward with a particular scenario where you should automate incremental testing. We will elaborate more on stubs and drivers and their functions in the next few sections of this blog.

The main difference between Big Bang integration and standard integration is the level of risk involved. In contrast, the standard integration approach – where all integrated systems are tested methodically – is more controlled with a lower level of risk. Still, it can be more time-consuming and require additional resources to ensure each module is integrated correctly. Since the integration tests focus on testing the data flow between modules, it’s feasible to test for flawless experiences by ensuring that the overall system looks good to the user. This also makes it easier to detect flaws in the interface between components. Hardware Software Integration Testing is a process of testing Computer Software Components for high-level functionalities on the target hardware environment.

Software Testing Course In English

No need to wait for all units to be completed before testing begins. The most important modules are tested last and may be prone to defects. With this approach, some interface links might be missed because of the sheer number of interfaces to be tested. A hybrid method combines the benefits of both top-down and bottom-up approaches. There is no need to wait for all the modules to be developed as it saves time. In the bottom-up method, we ensure that the modules we are adding are the children of the previous ones.

The top-down approach uses stubs, which are generally easier to implement than drivers. Meanwhile, you can combine integration testing together with module testing. This is actually the simplest form of application for structured testing because it will form the basis to set the paths of each individual module.

Incremental Approach

The bottom-up approach is used on the layer from the bottom to middle. In this testing approach, once all the modules are developed and tested individually, they are integrated once and tested together at once. The only advantage of this type of testing is that it is very much suitable for smaller systems.

Integration testing exposes faults in the interaction between integrated units or modules/components. It begins after unit testing has been completed for all modules. First, individual software units are created, and then these units are checked by a development team. After successful checks, QA engineers start combining different units and inspecting them, focusing first on the interfaces and then on the connections between these units. But with the growing digital sphere, the demand for integration testing has increased.

Types of integration tests

The process can begin as soon as the relevant modules are available. Testing ensures that the application meets the client’s expectations, as well as reassuring the development team that assumptions made during unit testing are valid. Let’s imagine we have a Gmail application where we perform integration testing. Four key strategies to execute integration testing are big-bang, top-down, bottom-up and sandwich/hybrid testing. Are combined and tested as a single unit to check the functionality of the overall application. Bottom-up integration testing is where we start by testing the most minor components of our software first and then work our way up to the larger ones.

Which is Incremental integration testing

Instead of implementing the entire programming logic, they simulate data communication with the calling module while testing. In which the different units, modules or components of a software application are tested as a combined entity. However, these modules may be coded by different programmers. To accommodate such a test effort, it’s essential to have an integration testing approach that can simultaneously support testing logicality between multiple modules. When that happens, it’s easier to pick scenarios and loops by their effects on the overall system. Also known as the Big Bang testing, non-incremental integration testing is all about testing the logical interface between functional sections of the program all at once.

Previous PostWebsite Testing Checklist You Shouldn’t Ignore

Once you’re confident that the login feature is working correctly, you will test the messaging feature, and it goes on. Help to reduce the risk what is incremental testing of bugs caused by integration issues. They help to reduce the time taken for development by simulating the behavior of other components.


このサイトはスパムを低減するために Akismet を使っています。コメントデータの処理方法の詳細はこちらをご覧ください